Sync template from atomicqms-style deployment
This commit is contained in:
270
SOPs/SOP-002-CAPA.md
Normal file
270
SOPs/SOP-002-CAPA.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
|
||||
# Standard Operating Procedure: Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
|
||||
|
||||
| Document ID | SOP-002 |
|
||||
|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| Title | Corrective and Preventive Action |
|
||||
| Revision | 1.0 |
|
||||
| Effective Date | [DATE] |
|
||||
| Author | [AUTHOR] |
|
||||
| Approved By | [APPROVER] |
|
||||
| Department | Quality Assurance |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
To establish a systematic process for identifying, investigating, correcting, and preventing nonconformities and potential nonconformities in pediatric clinical research operations.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Scope
|
||||
|
||||
This procedure applies to:
|
||||
- Product and process nonconformities
|
||||
- Protocol deviations and violations
|
||||
- Adverse events requiring corrective action
|
||||
- Audit findings (internal, sponsor, regulatory)
|
||||
- Customer/sponsor complaints
|
||||
- Process deviations
|
||||
- IRB/Ethics Committee findings
|
||||
- Potential nonconformities identified through risk analysis
|
||||
- Child safety concerns requiring systemic response
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
| Term | Definition |
|
||||
|------|------------|
|
||||
| Corrective Action | Action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity |
|
||||
| Preventive Action | Action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity |
|
||||
| Root Cause | Fundamental reason for a nonconformity |
|
||||
| Effectiveness Check | Verification that implemented actions achieved desired results |
|
||||
| Protocol Deviation | Unplanned departure from protocol requirements |
|
||||
| Protocol Violation | Serious protocol deviation that may impact participant safety or data integrity |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 CAPA Owner
|
||||
- Investigates the issue
|
||||
- Identifies root cause
|
||||
- Develops and implements corrective/preventive actions
|
||||
- Verifies effectiveness
|
||||
- For pediatric safety issues, escalates immediately
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.2 Quality Assurance
|
||||
- Manages CAPA system
|
||||
- Assigns CAPA numbers
|
||||
- Tracks CAPA status
|
||||
- Reviews and approves CAPAs
|
||||
- Reports CAPA metrics to management
|
||||
- Monitors trends affecting pediatric participant safety
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.3 Principal Investigator
|
||||
- Reviews CAPAs related to study conduct
|
||||
- Determines if protocol deviations/violations require CAPA
|
||||
- Reports to sponsor and IRB/Ethics Committee as required
|
||||
- Ensures child safety concerns are addressed
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.4 Management
|
||||
- Provides resources for CAPA implementation
|
||||
- Reviews CAPA trends
|
||||
- Ensures timely closure
|
||||
- Escalates pediatric safety concerns to appropriate authorities
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Procedure
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 CAPA Initiation
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify nonconformity or potential nonconformity through:
|
||||
- Internal/external audits
|
||||
- Protocol deviations
|
||||
- Adverse events
|
||||
- Sponsor monitoring
|
||||
- IRB findings
|
||||
- Participant/family complaints
|
||||
- Quality metrics
|
||||
|
||||
2. Document issue on CAPA Form (FRM-003)
|
||||
|
||||
3. Classify severity and priority:
|
||||
- **Critical**: Immediate threat to child safety or data integrity
|
||||
- **Major**: Significant impact on quality or compliance
|
||||
- **Minor**: Limited impact, easily correctable
|
||||
|
||||
4. For pediatric safety concerns:
|
||||
- Immediate interim measures implemented
|
||||
- Principal Investigator and Medical Monitor notified
|
||||
- IRB/Ethics Committee notification per requirements
|
||||
|
||||
5. Assign CAPA owner
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.2 Investigation
|
||||
|
||||
1. Gather relevant data and evidence:
|
||||
- Study records and source documents
|
||||
- Interview personnel and families involved
|
||||
- Review environmental factors
|
||||
- Consider age-specific factors
|
||||
|
||||
2. Review related documents and records:
|
||||
- Protocol and protocol amendments
|
||||
- Informed consent/assent documents
|
||||
- Training records
|
||||
- Prior CAPAs
|
||||
|
||||
3. Use appropriate investigation tools:
|
||||
- 5 Whys
|
||||
- Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram
|
||||
- Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
|
||||
- Timeline analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.3 Root Cause Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify potential root causes, considering:
|
||||
- Human factors (training, fatigue, workload)
|
||||
- Process failures
|
||||
- Equipment or facility issues
|
||||
- Communication breakdowns
|
||||
- Pediatric-specific factors (age-appropriateness, family dynamics)
|
||||
|
||||
2. Verify root cause through evidence
|
||||
|
||||
3. Document root cause determination
|
||||
|
||||
4. Consider systemic implications:
|
||||
- Impact on other studies or sites
|
||||
- Need for system-wide changes
|
||||
- Regulatory reporting requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.4 Action Development
|
||||
|
||||
1. Develop corrective/preventive actions that address root cause
|
||||
|
||||
2. For pediatric research CAPAs, consider:
|
||||
- Impact on child participants (current and future)
|
||||
- Changes to assent/consent processes
|
||||
- Age-appropriateness modifications
|
||||
- Family communication needs
|
||||
- IRB/Ethics Committee approval requirements
|
||||
|
||||
3. Assign responsibilities and due dates
|
||||
|
||||
4. Assess actions for:
|
||||
- Appropriateness to problem severity
|
||||
- Impact on other processes and studies
|
||||
- Resource requirements
|
||||
- Regulatory implications
|
||||
|
||||
5. Obtain necessary approvals:
|
||||
- Quality Assurance
|
||||
- Principal Investigator
|
||||
- Sponsor (if applicable)
|
||||
- IRB/Ethics Committee (if required)
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.5 Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
1. Execute approved actions per timeline
|
||||
|
||||
2. Document implementation evidence
|
||||
|
||||
3. Update affected documents/processes:
|
||||
- Revise SOPs
|
||||
- Update training materials
|
||||
- Modify study documents (with IRB approval)
|
||||
|
||||
4. Provide training as needed:
|
||||
- Staff training on changes
|
||||
- Refresher training if knowledge gaps identified
|
||||
|
||||
5. Communicate changes to:
|
||||
- Study team members
|
||||
- Sponsor
|
||||
- IRB/Ethics Committee
|
||||
- Participants/families (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.6 Effectiveness Verification
|
||||
|
||||
1. Define effectiveness criteria (measurable outcomes)
|
||||
|
||||
2. Establish verification timeframe:
|
||||
- Minimum 30 days for routine CAPAs
|
||||
- Shorter for critical safety issues with ongoing monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
3. Collect and analyze data:
|
||||
- Review metrics
|
||||
- Monitor for recurrence
|
||||
- Audit compliance
|
||||
|
||||
4. Document verification results
|
||||
|
||||
5. If ineffective:
|
||||
- Reopen CAPA for further action
|
||||
- Perform additional root cause analysis
|
||||
- Develop alternative actions
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.7 Closure
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review all CAPA documentation for completeness
|
||||
|
||||
2. Verify all actions completed
|
||||
|
||||
3. Confirm effectiveness verified
|
||||
|
||||
4. Obtain Quality Assurance approval for closure
|
||||
|
||||
5. Document lessons learned
|
||||
|
||||
6. Update risk assessments if applicable
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Special Considerations for Pediatric Research
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.1 Child Safety Issues
|
||||
- Immediate action required for any threat to child safety
|
||||
- Principal Investigator and Medical Monitor notification
|
||||
- IRB/Ethics Committee and regulatory authority notification per timelines
|
||||
- Parental notification process activated
|
||||
- Consider Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) review if applicable
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.2 Assent/Consent Issues
|
||||
- Any CAPA affecting informed consent or assent requires IRB approval
|
||||
- Age-appropriateness concerns addressed by pediatric specialist
|
||||
- Updated documents require re-consent/re-assent per regulations
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.3 Family Communication
|
||||
- Transparent communication with affected families
|
||||
- Age-appropriate explanations for child participants
|
||||
- Cultural sensitivity in communications
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. CAPA Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
Quality Assurance shall track and report:
|
||||
- Number of open CAPAs
|
||||
- CAPA aging (days open)
|
||||
- On-time closure rate
|
||||
- Effectiveness rate
|
||||
- CAPAs by category/source:
|
||||
- Protocol deviations/violations
|
||||
- Adverse events
|
||||
- Audit findings
|
||||
- Pediatric safety concerns
|
||||
- Repeat/recurring issues
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Related Documents
|
||||
|
||||
- FRM-003 CAPA Form
|
||||
- SOP-004 Internal Audit
|
||||
- SOP-REG-001 Regulatory Reporting
|
||||
- SOP-SAF-001 Pediatric Safety Monitoring
|
||||
- SOP-PED-004 Protocol Deviation Management
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. References
|
||||
|
||||
- ICH-GCP E6(R2) Section 5.20 (Noncompliance)
|
||||
- 45 CFR 46.103 (Assurance of Compliance)
|
||||
- 21 CFR 312.56 (Review of Ongoing Investigations)
|
||||
- ISO 13485:2016 Section 8.5 (Improvement)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Rev | Date | Description | Author |
|
||||
|-----|------|-------------|--------|
|
||||
| 1.0 | [DATE] | Initial release | [AUTHOR] |
|
||||
Reference in New Lab Ticket
Block a user