7.5 KiB
Standard Operating Procedure: Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)
| Document ID | SOP-002 |
|---|---|
| Title | Corrective and Preventive Action |
| Revision | 1.0 |
| Effective Date | [DATE] |
| Author | [AUTHOR] |
| Approved By | [APPROVER] |
| Department | Quality Assurance |
1. Purpose
To establish a systematic process for identifying, investigating, correcting, and preventing nonconformities and potential nonconformities in pediatric clinical research operations.
2. Scope
This procedure applies to:
- Product and process nonconformities
- Protocol deviations and violations
- Adverse events requiring corrective action
- Audit findings (internal, sponsor, regulatory)
- Customer/sponsor complaints
- Process deviations
- IRB/Ethics Committee findings
- Potential nonconformities identified through risk analysis
- Child safety concerns requiring systemic response
3. Definitions
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Corrective Action | Action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity |
| Preventive Action | Action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity |
| Root Cause | Fundamental reason for a nonconformity |
| Effectiveness Check | Verification that implemented actions achieved desired results |
| Protocol Deviation | Unplanned departure from protocol requirements |
| Protocol Violation | Serious protocol deviation that may impact participant safety or data integrity |
4. Responsibilities
4.1 CAPA Owner
- Investigates the issue
- Identifies root cause
- Develops and implements corrective/preventive actions
- Verifies effectiveness
- For pediatric safety issues, escalates immediately
4.2 Quality Assurance
- Manages CAPA system
- Assigns CAPA numbers
- Tracks CAPA status
- Reviews and approves CAPAs
- Reports CAPA metrics to management
- Monitors trends affecting pediatric participant safety
4.3 Principal Investigator
- Reviews CAPAs related to study conduct
- Determines if protocol deviations/violations require CAPA
- Reports to sponsor and IRB/Ethics Committee as required
- Ensures child safety concerns are addressed
4.4 Management
- Provides resources for CAPA implementation
- Reviews CAPA trends
- Ensures timely closure
- Escalates pediatric safety concerns to appropriate authorities
5. Procedure
5.1 CAPA Initiation
-
Identify nonconformity or potential nonconformity through:
- Internal/external audits
- Protocol deviations
- Adverse events
- Sponsor monitoring
- IRB findings
- Participant/family complaints
- Quality metrics
-
Document issue on CAPA Form (FRM-003)
-
Classify severity and priority:
- Critical: Immediate threat to child safety or data integrity
- Major: Significant impact on quality or compliance
- Minor: Limited impact, easily correctable
-
For pediatric safety concerns:
- Immediate interim measures implemented
- Principal Investigator and Medical Monitor notified
- IRB/Ethics Committee notification per requirements
-
Assign CAPA owner
5.2 Investigation
-
Gather relevant data and evidence:
- Study records and source documents
- Interview personnel and families involved
- Review environmental factors
- Consider age-specific factors
-
Review related documents and records:
- Protocol and protocol amendments
- Informed consent/assent documents
- Training records
- Prior CAPAs
-
Use appropriate investigation tools:
- 5 Whys
- Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram
- Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
- Timeline analysis
5.3 Root Cause Analysis
-
Identify potential root causes, considering:
- Human factors (training, fatigue, workload)
- Process failures
- Equipment or facility issues
- Communication breakdowns
- Pediatric-specific factors (age-appropriateness, family dynamics)
-
Verify root cause through evidence
-
Document root cause determination
-
Consider systemic implications:
- Impact on other studies or sites
- Need for system-wide changes
- Regulatory reporting requirements
5.4 Action Development
-
Develop corrective/preventive actions that address root cause
-
For pediatric research CAPAs, consider:
- Impact on child participants (current and future)
- Changes to assent/consent processes
- Age-appropriateness modifications
- Family communication needs
- IRB/Ethics Committee approval requirements
-
Assign responsibilities and due dates
-
Assess actions for:
- Appropriateness to problem severity
- Impact on other processes and studies
- Resource requirements
- Regulatory implications
-
Obtain necessary approvals:
- Quality Assurance
- Principal Investigator
- Sponsor (if applicable)
- IRB/Ethics Committee (if required)
5.5 Implementation
-
Execute approved actions per timeline
-
Document implementation evidence
-
Update affected documents/processes:
- Revise SOPs
- Update training materials
- Modify study documents (with IRB approval)
-
Provide training as needed:
- Staff training on changes
- Refresher training if knowledge gaps identified
-
Communicate changes to:
- Study team members
- Sponsor
- IRB/Ethics Committee
- Participants/families (if applicable)
5.6 Effectiveness Verification
-
Define effectiveness criteria (measurable outcomes)
-
Establish verification timeframe:
- Minimum 30 days for routine CAPAs
- Shorter for critical safety issues with ongoing monitoring
-
Collect and analyze data:
- Review metrics
- Monitor for recurrence
- Audit compliance
-
Document verification results
-
If ineffective:
- Reopen CAPA for further action
- Perform additional root cause analysis
- Develop alternative actions
5.7 Closure
-
Review all CAPA documentation for completeness
-
Verify all actions completed
-
Confirm effectiveness verified
-
Obtain Quality Assurance approval for closure
-
Document lessons learned
-
Update risk assessments if applicable
6. Special Considerations for Pediatric Research
6.1 Child Safety Issues
- Immediate action required for any threat to child safety
- Principal Investigator and Medical Monitor notification
- IRB/Ethics Committee and regulatory authority notification per timelines
- Parental notification process activated
- Consider Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) review if applicable
6.2 Assent/Consent Issues
- Any CAPA affecting informed consent or assent requires IRB approval
- Age-appropriateness concerns addressed by pediatric specialist
- Updated documents require re-consent/re-assent per regulations
6.3 Family Communication
- Transparent communication with affected families
- Age-appropriate explanations for child participants
- Cultural sensitivity in communications
7. CAPA Metrics
Quality Assurance shall track and report:
- Number of open CAPAs
- CAPA aging (days open)
- On-time closure rate
- Effectiveness rate
- CAPAs by category/source:
- Protocol deviations/violations
- Adverse events
- Audit findings
- Pediatric safety concerns
- Repeat/recurring issues
8. Related Documents
- FRM-003 CAPA Form
- SOP-004 Internal Audit
- SOP-REG-001 Regulatory Reporting
- SOP-SAF-001 Pediatric Safety Monitoring
- SOP-PED-004 Protocol Deviation Management
9. References
- ICH-GCP E6(R2) Section 5.20 (Noncompliance)
- 45 CFR 46.103 (Assurance of Compliance)
- 21 CFR 312.56 (Review of Ongoing Investigations)
- ISO 13485:2016 Section 8.5 (Improvement)
Revision History
| Rev | Date | Description | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | [DATE] | Initial release | [AUTHOR] |